Non-compete clauses are widespread options of employment agreements across the enterprise world and are sometimes used to dissuade corporations from ‘poaching’ one other’s staff, and/or to stop staff (no less than for a sure time interval) from taking the information gained from working at one firm to a competitor. Which may permit corporations to guard the ‘investments‘ they’ve made of their staff and keep continuity amongst their workers.
Nevertheless, these agreements can be unduly restrictive in the direction of staff, limiting their potential to advance inside their chosen business, which is very problematic in expert professions that may have required years of training and coaching simply to enter within the first place. Additional, critics of non-compete agreements argue that they prohibit dynamism within the general financial system by making it tougher for companies to rent (because the pool of candidates can be smaller in industries the place non-competes are prevalent), and for workers topic to non-competes to begin new corporations.
With these components in thoughts, the Federal Commerce Fee (FTC) in April of 2024 introduced a closing rule banning most non-competes nationwide that’s anticipated to take impact (pending authorized challenges) on September 4, 2024. To adjust to the rule, employers are required to present written discover to related employees (which embrace staff and impartial contractors, amongst different classes), letting them know that their non-compete agreements are unenforceable and won’t be enforced.
Notably, the ban consists of exemptions for “senior executives“ who beforehand had signed a non-compete (new non-competes are banned for all staff, together with senior executives) and within the case of a “bona fide sale of a enterprise entity, of the individual’s possession curiosity in a enterprise entity, or of all or considerably all of a enterprise entity’s working property“. This latter exemption implies that monetary advisors with an possession curiosity of their firm (even a really small one) may nonetheless be topic to a non-compete as a time period of the sale of their stake (which may affect how they worth receiving an possession curiosity of their agency).
Moreover, the regulation doesn’t prohibit non-solicit agreements (which prohibit a departing worker from soliciting the purchasers of their former employer for a specified time interval), that are extra widespread than non-competes within the monetary recommendation business, which means that non-solicit agreements can stay in place, and may even change into extra prevalent amongst corporations which might be not in a position to implement non-competes. However as a result of implementing non-solicits might be much less clear-cut than implementing non-competes (on condition that it’s tougher to inform whether or not a person is actively soliciting their former employer’s purchasers in comparison with acquiring a job at a competitor or beginning their very own enterprise), the variety of authorized battles over non-solicits may enhance as their use rises. Which may make it extra advantageous for corporations and advisors alike to think about a extra equitable, cooperative method than strict on-competes or non-solicits to deciding which purchasers an advisor can solicit in the event that they do finally depart the agency.
In the end, the important thing level is that the FTC’s ban on non-competes might present advisors with elevated flexibility to maneuver amongst corporations throughout the monetary recommendation business, whereas additionally providing the chance for each monetary advisory corporations and their advisors to revisit their employment agreements… not solely to make sure that they adjust to the FTC’s closing rule, but additionally in order that they higher meet the wants advisors and their corporations!
