Jamie Golombek: Taxpayer on the hook for high-quality for improperly transferring contributions from one financial institution to a different
Opinions and proposals are unbiased and merchandise are independently chosen. Postmedia could earn an affiliate fee from purchases made by way of hyperlinks on this web page.
Article content material
I acquired my 2023 Discover of Evaluation this week and it contained the complete particulars of my tax evaluation, an evidence of adjustments and different necessary data, together with a one-page detailed registered retirement financial savings plan (RRSP) deduction restrict and out there contribution room assertion. What it didn’t include, nonetheless, was an analogous assertion about my out there tax-free financial savings account (TFSA) contribution room.
Commercial 2
Article content material
For this, that you must log on to the Canada Income Company’s portal, My Account or cellphone the tax data cellphone service (TIPS) at 1-800-267-6999. Assuming you’ve the endurance to carry (wait occasions this week have been 1.5 to 2 hours), you possibly can ask an agent for a TFSA Room Assertion and a TFSA Transaction Abstract, which present the data the CRA has acquired out of your TFSA issuers about your contributions and withdrawals.
Article content material
Annually, all TFSA issuers are required to electronically submit a TFSA report to the CRA for every particular person who has a TFSA. Issuers should submit this data by the final day of February of the next yr, and report all TFSA transactions you made on or earlier than Dec. 31 of the prior yr.
It’s necessary, nonetheless, to check the TFSA transaction data the CRA has with your personal information to make sure the data they’ve is appropriate and updated. It’s doable that while you look on-line, particularly within the first few months of the yr, the CRA could not but have acquired and processed the earlier yr’s transactions, that means they’re not but mirrored within the TFSA quantities proven on-line. This might result in an overcontribution.
High Tales
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
The penalty for overcontributing is the same as one per cent per 30 days for every month you’re over your restrict. In the event you get assessed a TFSA penalty tax, you possibly can request the CRA to waive or cancel it, which the company has the facility to do if it may be established the tax arose “as a consequence of an inexpensive error,” and the overcontribution is withdrawn from the TFSA “immediately.”
If the CRA refuses to cancel the tax, you possibly can take the matter to Federal Court docket, the place a decide will decide whether or not the CRA’s resolution to not waive the tax was “cheap.”
The newest resolution involving a TFSA overcontribution, determined in April 2024, involved a taxpayer who went about transferring his TFSA from one monetary establishment to a different within the mistaken manner.
The taxpayer had at the very least two TFSA accounts. Initially of 2020, his unused TFSA room was $6,270. He contributed a complete of $46,000 in 2020, and so he exceeded his restrict by $39,730 and was consequently assessed a penalty tax.
The supply of his overcontributions might be traced again to the taxpayer’s actions in early 2020. On Feb. 4, 2020, he withdrew $20,000 from his Fédération des caisses Desjardins du Québec TFSA account, and deposited it the following day into his Nationwide Financial institution TFSA account.
Commercial 4
Article content material
He did the identical factor once more the next month, when on March 9, 2020, he withdrew one other $20,000 from his Desjardins TFSA account, solely to deposit it the following day into his Nationwide Financial institution of Canada TFSA. He had additionally deposited one other $6,000 into his TFSA account in early 2020, so his complete 2020 TFSA contributions have been $46,000, however he solely had $6,270 in unused room.
In July 2021, the taxpayer acquired a discover from the CRA advising him that he had exceeded his TFSA contribution restrict in 2020, and telling him he needed to pay $2,166 in penalty tax on his extra contributions for 2020.
In October 2021, the taxpayer despatched a letter to the CRA requesting that it cancel the tax on his extra TFSA contributions. In March 2022, the CRA wrote to him denying his request, saying it may solely accomplish that if the contributions have been made because of a “cheap error,” and the person instantly took steps to withdraw them from the TFSA, which was not the case right here.
Following this refusal, the taxpayer filed a second software in April 2022 for the cancellation of the tax. In June 2022, the CRA once more denied his request “as a result of the transfers of funds made in 2020 from one TFSA account to a different TFSA account weren’t ‘direct transfers’ for the reason that transfers weren’t made by the monetary establishment.” The end result was that these transfers have been thought of to be common contributions, placing the taxpayer in an overcontribution state of affairs.
Commercial 5
Article content material
The taxpayer appealed this resolution to the Federal Court docket. He argued that “he (had) acted in good religion in transferring funds from one TFSA account to a different.” However the CRA maintained that the taxpayer’s error on this case was not a “cheap error” as a result of he admitted he had not made his transfers within the method prescribed by the CRA (by asking his monetary establishment to take action immediately) since he was unaware of the duty to take action. Within the CRA’s view, its train of discretion to waive the penalty tax wouldn’t be applicable within the circumstances.
The decide reviewed the arguments after which cited varied prior circumstances coping with comparable situations through which it was held that it was as much as the taxpayer to grasp the TFSA guidelines, together with property switch funds “immediately” from one TFSA to a different.
It will probably’t merely be finished by way of a withdrawal and subsequent deposit, however have to be finished immediately by the monetary establishment. In most of these circumstances, the courts have constantly held that the CRA’s refusal to deal with such errors as “cheap errors” (which might permit the CRA to waive the tax), was, itself, cheap.
Commercial 6
Article content material
The decide in the end expressed sympathy for the taxpayer, however stated he was “sure by the jurisprudence and ideas recognized by my colleagues. My function is to not rule on the deserves, however to evaluate whether or not the (CRA’s) resolution is cheap, figuring out whether or not it’s intelligible, clear and justified.” The decide concluded that it was, and dismissed the taxpayer’s case.
Beneficial from Editorial
Whereas the CRA sought prices, the decide refused to award the company something owing to the unlucky circumstances of the case.
Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Personal Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.
In the event you appreciated this story, join extra within the FP Investor publication.
Bookmark our web site and assist our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information that you must know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters right here.
Article content material
